Minimally Invasive Hip Replacement Vs Traditional

A minimally invasive total hip replacement uses a smaller cut incision than a traditional total hip replacement.

Minimally invasive hip replacement vs traditional.

1 6 this area of ongoing research is an example of how the medical field is continually evolving and trying to improve outcomes for patients. It is not yet clear whether the procedure leads to an increased risk of certain complications though. That is the damaged portion of the hip is removed and replaced it with an implant. For these two types of surgeries the general procedure that takes place is the same.

Minimally invasive hip replacement surgery both the posterior approach and the lateral anterior approach have been adapted for use in minimally invasive techniques. Proponents of minimally invasive hip replacement say small incision operations can lessen blood loss ease post operative pain trim hospital stays improve scar appearance and speed healing. There are two different types of hip replacement surgeries traditional hip replacement or minimally invasive hip replacement. This incision extends into the quadriceps tendon which provides the surgeon good.

Research on minimally invasive hip replacement surgery is mixed and it is not clear whether it has an advantage over traditional hip replacement surgery. When performing a traditional knee replacement initially the surgeon makes an 8 to 10 inch vertical incision over the front of the knee to expose the joint. There are pros and cons to traditional hip replacement when compared with minimally invasive hip replacement. The hip is a ball and socket type joint.

Minimally invasive total knee replacement uses a smaller incision than a traditional knee replacement so it may lead to less pain and decreased recovery time. The goal of using shorter incisions is to reduce pain and speed recovery. A variation of this approach is a minimally invasive procedure in which one or two shorter incisions are used. In the meantime people considering hip replacement surgery and their surgeons must make decisions.

The surrounding soft tissue is separated to allow access and visibility of the hip joint. Using a standard approach a surgeon can transition to a minimally invasive approach by gradually shortening the incision to 4 inches or less. In traditional hip replacement a large incision 10 12 inches long is made to the side of the hip and the whole joint is exposed. It also uses special tools.