Research on minimally invasive hip replacement surgery is mixed and it is not clear whether it has an advantage over traditional hip replacement surgery.
Minimally invasive hip replacement surgery.
Minimally invasive techniques are designed to reduce the tissue trauma associated with hip replacement.
Less trauma to the tissues results in less postoperative discomfort and.
In the hip joint the rounded head of the thigh bone the femoral head moves smoothly inside the round socket of the hip bone.
Beneath the incision the muscle is separated and the hip joint is exposed.
The surgeon then removes the arthritic hip joint and replaces this with a metal and plastic implant.
American association of hip and knee surgeons minimally invasive and small incision joint replacement surgery.
1 6 this area of ongoing research is an example of how the medical field is continually evolving and trying to improve outcomes for patients.
Traditional hip replacement surgery is done through an incision that is usually about 5 to 8 inches in length.
The surgery is performed with smaller incisions.
In the meantime people considering hip replacement surgery and their surgeons must make decisions.
A primary difference between minimally invasive hip replacement surgery and traditional hip replacement surgery is the amount of skin muscle and other soft tissues that must be cut.
Minimally invasive and small incision total hip replacement surgery is an evolving area and more research is needed on the long term function and durability of the implants.
The benefits of minimally invasive hip replacement have been reported to include less damage to soft tissues leading to a quicker less painful recovery and more rapid.
What surgeons should consider park ridge ill 2004.
It also uses special tools.